Thursday, November 24, 2005

Question of consent?

In law an unconscious person cannot give consent

Jon Silverman looks at the implications of a case which
collapsed after a woman who alleged she was raped
told a court she had been too drunk to remember
whether she had consented to sex.
The failure of one case at a crown court is not going to

have a significant impact on the future course of rape
prosecutions.
But it does underline the difficulties in this area of the

law around the crucial issue of consent.
The Sex Offences Act 2003 has made it considerably
harder for a defendant to argue that he reasonably
believed that a woman had consented to sex.
In cases where a woman can satisfy a jury that she

was asleep or unconscious, the onus has shifted
towards the man who has to prove otherwise.
However, that still leaves a considerable proportion

of trials where alcohol is a factor and where the jury
is offered two conflicting versions of events without
any third party corroboration.

link:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4467078.stm

NO MEANS NO!
what does I CAN'T REMEMBER SAY?
Sticky situation I must admit.


No comments:

All About Me

My photo
Too many missing people. Too many BAD relationships. Too many errors in judgement. If the infomation on this site prevents 1 mistake it has accomplished something.

Bossco- Family addition 3months 2 weeks

Bossco- Family addition 3months 2 weeks

Bossco again

Bossco again
The only time he is good...

Blog Archive